Where do good ideas come from?
A short musing on where inspiration comes from, or how to come up with fresh ideas when you're stuck.
Thank you for reading The Garden of Forking Paths. If you enjoy my work and want to support me so I can keep writing for you, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription.
The fine people at Substack asked me to write a bit of advice to writers about where good ideas come from, so I’ve adapted that piece here for your enjoyment. Whether you write or not, I hope these insights might prove useful to you for creativity or coming up with a fresh idea when you feel stuck.
How to discover a good idea
Great writing is a conjuring trick. The reader watches, mystified, as a powerful idea appears on the page or the screen, fully formed, as if plucked from the ether. Poof! Where did it come from? A true magician never reveals their secret.
Meanwhile, the bad ideas are like dead rabbits, martyrs made when the magician failed to extricate them from the hat with skill and care, innocent victims of “practice makes perfect,” never to be seen or mentioned again.
Here’s the truth: we all need to allow glimpses of those dead rabbits. They allow us to treat our creative work as an intellectual proving ground, a place to try new tricks. But eventually, we all run out of rabbits, dead or alive, and nobody wants to look at an empty hat.
So where do we get good ideas—or even mediocre ones—when we’ve run out? (A fair warning: If I had the perfect answer, I wouldn’t write just once or twice a week and I’d have a hell of a lot more subscribers.) But there are two insights I’ve found useful. So here, among the initiated, I’ll reveal my secret.
In the Middle Ages, beautifully illustrated anthologies of writing were produced called florilegia. The name means “gathered flowers,” and these “flowers” were wise written snippets taken from sages past and present, smooshed together and bound. These were the original medieval mixtapes, an aggregation of insight, creativity, and knowledge. The creators of these books understood that all ideas are remixes—and that genius is relational.
Every writer is therefore a thief. But what we are guilty of is not a crime, but creativity. Ideas are additive. Einstein discovered relativity by riffing off and refuting existing scientific ideas, not by plucking an entirely new one from the ether. Hercule Poirot had a trusty sidekick because Agatha Christie was dazzled by Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson. She was inspired, then created something astonishingly original.
Every good idea I’ve ever had has come, in part, from someone else’s good idea. Two of my most-read articles, “The Myth of the Secret Genius” and “Billionaires and the Evolution of Overconfidence,” emerged when I took a less familiar realm of knowledge—evolutionary biology, in this case—and combined it with my expertise on the nature of power. Readers told me it created something fresh.
Concretely, this means that when I’m stuck, I take the florilegia approach: I read wise snippets from those who know things I don’t, contemplating ideas that are completely new to me.
Seeking out unfamiliar intellectual terrain isn’t always natural to us, because humans are reinforcement creatures who crave familiarity and loathe uncertainty or the unknown. As a result, we fall into the trap of reading writers who are most like ourselves, figuring that inspiration is most likely to flow from intellectual proximity. In my experience, that’s a mistake. Nobody wants a mixtape full of songs from the same band.
Every writer has deep expertise, parts of the world they intimately and intuitively understand. The best ideas, I’ve found, emerge when writers plant that knowledge somewhere a little different, an economist who brings game theory to sports, a poet who writes about politics, or a journalist who, every so often, looks inward and makes themselves the focus of their story. Take what you know and introduce it to something you don’t.
The best ideas, I’ve found, emerge when writers plant that knowledge somewhere a little different. Take what you know and introduce it to something you don’t.
Unfortunately, hastily arranged introductions don’t always work. Trying to force an idea into the ether so that you can pluck it out and plop it down onto the page is as effective as an insomniac trying to will themselves back to sleep.
This is the second lesson I’ve learned: to rely on a strategy known as “leisure-time invention.” It draws on the experiences of great thinkers past and present who tried, and failed, to explain the process by which they came up with their best ideas. Einstein swore that his mind was most inventive while playing the violin. The Wright brothers developed the prototype for their flying machine after seeing buzzards during a picnic. Galileo invented the pendulum clock while gazing at a chandelier swaying in a cathedral.
Henri Poincaré, a mathematical genius who paved the way for the discovery of chaos theory, toiled with a problem for weeks, to no avail. Then, one night, he wrote, “contrary to my custom, I drank black coffee and could not sleep.” Soon, “ideas arose in crowds; I felt them collide until pairs interlocked.” When he woke up, he marveled, “I had only to write out the results.” When he stopped trying to solve the problem, he solved it.
When I’m stuck, I take my dog for a walk. I let my mind wander. It’s unfocused thought, giving my brain a bit more space to experiment without a goal. Writing, then, is like learning to be a sponge that never gets wrung out, always observing, absorbing, thinking.
And when the rough blob of an idea flits into my mind, I capture it—not with paper and quill, like the more romantic figures of the past, but with a note on my phone or an email to myself. Sometimes the idea turns out to be a dud. Other times, it takes some time to mature, then collides with another rough blob of an idea months later.
It works. And I swear by it, because I’ve learned the hard way that a forced idea, willed into existence while glowering at a blank page, will almost always end up being a dead rabbit that never had a chance.
—Brian
Thank you for reading The Garden of Forking Paths. I hope this piece—aimed at creativity for writers—helps you think about whatever creative pursuits you’re passionate about a little bit differently.
When I’m stuck, I take my dog for a walk. I let my mind wander. It’s unfocused thought, giving my brain a bit more space to experiment without a goal. Writing, then, is like learning to be a sponge that never gets wrung out, always observing, absorbing, thinking.
And when the rough blob of an idea flits into my mind, I capture it—not with paper and quill, like the more romantic figures of the past, but with a note on my phone or an email to myself. Sometimes the idea turns out to be a dud. Other times, it takes some time to mature, then collides with another rough blob of an idea months later.
It works. And I swear by it, because I’ve learned the hard way that a forced idea, willed into existence while glowering at a blank page, will almost always end up being a dead rabbit that never had a chance.
This strikes me as something AI can't do--it can force ideas, but as Brian says, you'll end up with a dead rabbit?
I occasionally will "cop out" by writing a "three random things" post--three short subjects on things that caught my attention and that I feel I could write a few grafs about, but not expound on.
Except that, so far, 3 times out of 5, I start writing what's intended to be the first random thing, and find that once I've started I wind up with a complete article just about that subject, after all. Of the remaining 2 in 5, 1 in 5, it's the second "random thing" that turns long, and bumps out the first and third. Only that last chance in 5 actually winds up being a Three Random Things post.
In my day job as a software engineer, I allow myself a lot of fallow time. When I worked in an office, this was perilous, because it often looked like I was not actually working. If you're not actually typing code, you're not working, right? I was fortunate in that some bosses believed in and understood me when I told them my brain needs to set problems into the background and do other things sometimes, mainly because they saw that I not only produced good results but did so on time. Becoming a full-time remote worker (which I did long before the pandemic) broke me free from caring about who was looking over my shoulder and made this process more powerful.
It does mean that I spend a chunk of my day doomscrolling, but the work gets done, well, and on time. That's all that should matter.